Teachers Expectations:
Talking to some of the teachers on the first day of the training, I realized they had the following expectations at the end of the training.
- Personal Development – under which they expected to have full confidence in using of XO laptops in class.
- Experience Sharing – under which they expected to share on how they were making use of the XOs in the schools e.g. Kagugu Primary school.
- Teaching Capacity Connections – under which they expected to built along lasting relationship consortium that they can continue to learn from each other and even connect to other teachers on how to use XOs in Teaching and Learning.
- Techinical Support Followup – Under which they expected OPLC to built a technical support team that will be able to address issues related to XOs hardware, Software and Electrical (Power strips failures) in the schools.
- Motivational Platiforms – under which they expected ‘Teaching Capacity Connections’ to address recognition of those who are doing very well in the use of the XOs in the schools. In this case, they considered rewards in any form.
Achievements:
Partly, some of the above mentioned expectations were realized for example
- Personal Development – during the training, some reference manuals were issued to teachers on how to develop confidence by working with some lesson plans.
- Experience Sharing – during the training, some teachers presented on how the use XOs in the schools and the outcomes in terms of enrolment and performance
Project sustainability Gaps realized
- Teaching Capacity Connections – most participants did not understand how to create reference points with colleagues (Teachers) in different schools. In this case, they did not understand on how work on lesson plans by either relying on OLPC or some of the innovative teachers who are already making use of the XOs in Teaching and Learning.The training did not address the issues on how the teachers can make reference to their colleagues in relation to lesson plans. In my opinion, I thought it would have been wise if the teachers would have created a consortium sort of to start working closely with the few innovative teachers making use of the XOs already in class.
- Technical Support Follow up – most participants did not differentiate OLPC technical support from the trainers. In my own opinion, I think it is high time for OLPC to identify specific people in the right professions to carry out hardware and software repairs and maintenance in schools other than relying on the trainers to do the same task.For example, most schools complained of some power strips and chargers not working. Furthermore, teachers lack enough time to interact with OLPC team to get good advice on technical issues because most of the time, they are busy doing training on how to use XO in teaching.
- Motivational Platforms – most participants raised concerns on how they do not participate in Information and Communication Technology forums related to technology in education in Rwanda. They wished to work closely with OLPC to position them in some of the forums either local or international.For example, I had a chat with one of the headmasters from Kagugu, who raised concern on how he was not aware of the elearning africa conference that was held in Lusaka in May.He expressed he wished to be participating to express OLPC progress in Rwanda.
Conclusion
Having five expectations, I found out that 2 out of 5 expectations were addressed. It is my wish that OLPC review some of the expectations I have mentioned above.